Friday, 14 December 2012

PERJUANGAN YANG BELUM SELESAI

INI SUARA DG294144! BN atau PR Dengarlah

Teruskan usaha sahabat sekalian. Nasib kita bukanlah akibat kesilapan tindakan kita, tetapi disebabkan oleh kelemahan sistem yang dirangka. Kumpulan kita teraniaya dan dibela sekadar asalkan ada. Mahu mengharap pada siapa? Kerugian kita makin berganda-ganda. Bukan tidak bersyukur, bukan tidak ikhlas…itu bukan persoalannya. Hak kita yang dinafikan oleh sistem yang dirangka, malang lagi setelah diketahui ada kumpulan yang teraniaya…susah pula mahu merombak sistem untuk membela nasib kumpulan ini. Allah maha mengetahui dan maha mendengar. Kita tetap teruskan usaha dengan kudrat yang ada.

Kemas kini: 8/12/2012
Catatan awal: 3/12/2009
Kolum ini khusus untuk perbincangan isu DG2941.

HARGAILAH PENGORBANAN DAN KESUNGGUHAN GURU-GURU DG294144 MENINGKATKAN PROFESIONALISME DAN MEMARTABATKAN PROFESION KEGURUAN

BERILAH KEADILAN UNTUK DG2941
Sila berikan komentar anda.

Petikan dari Blog Harakahdaily
Keluhan Guru yang disisihkan
Guru tersisih,
Guru tersisihSaya adalah antara ribuan guru malang di negara ini. Nasib kami jelas tidak dipedulikan apatah lagi diperjuangkan oleh kesatuan guru mahupun mana-mana pihak berkaitan.
Dasar JPA dan Kementerian Pelajaran membunuh semangat kami, merugikan kami sepanjang perkhidmatan malah sepanjang hayat. Nasib kami amat malang jika dibandingkan dengan guru-guru lain kebelakangan ini, sedangkan kami juga belajar untuk memperolehi ijazah seperti orang lain dengan wang kami sendiri.
Fahamilah kami, lihatlah apa yang berlaku sebenarnya melalui jadual yang berikut:
BILPERKARADASAR UNTUK KAMIDASAR SEKARANG
1Tarikh Graduasi20012010
2Temuduga Ke DG4120022010
3Pelantikan Ke DG32TAK SEMPATDAPAT
4Lantikan Ke DG4120042010
5Pelarasan Gaji 200715%25%
6DG41 Ke DG4410 Thn Atau 7 + 3 Tahun8 Thn Atau 5 + 3 Tahun
Paling menyedihkan apabila guru yang baru saja dilantik ke DG41, gaji mereka lebih jauh tingginya daripada gaji kami walaupun kami berada di Gred DG44. Sedangkan kami lebih lama berkhidmat.
Kami yang telah lama berkhidmat tetapi bayangkan berapa banyak yang kami rugi sekiranya masih ada 20 tahun perkhidmatan kami berdasarkan mata tanggagaji kami yang jauh lebih rendah. Juga bayangkan ke mana perginya kekananan kami disebabkan dasar JPA dan Kementerian yang sentiasa berubah-ubah.
Apa yang lebih dikesali ialah tiada mana-mana kesatuan guru memperjuangkan nasib kami, yang heboh diperdendangkan sekadar “melepaskan batok di tangga”. Kesatuan guru, JPS mahupun KPM diam seribu bahasa.
Jangan marahkan guru jika mereka beralih arah menyokong Pakatan Rakyat dalam pilahan raya akan datang. Hakikatnya memang telah ramai pun guru yang menyokong PR akibat dasar JPA dan KPM yang kurang prihatin masalah ini.
Sebenarnya, kami tidak minta mahupun merebut apatah lagi merampas hak orang tetapi biarlah dilayan dan diberikan hak yang seadil-adilnya. Adil sepertimana orang lain dapat. Berlaku adillah untuk masa depan perkhidmatan kami.
—–
> Harakahdaily

Petikan dari Blog NUTP
lan lin said…
Seperti yang saya sudah faham selepas PM mengumumkan 6 intensif buat guru, memang tiada kenaikan gaji buat kami guru DGA29/41 tetapi time based sahaja.
Nasib kami DGA29/41 tetap tidak terbela. Gaji pokok kami terus ketinggalan. Tahun 2009, guru DGA32 yang baru berijazah dan sudah ditemuduga untuk mengisi jawatan DG41 akan bergaji RM2809.30 akan dilantik ke DG41 akan mendapat 1 gaji terdekat dalam gaji DG41 iaitu menjadi RM2871.70 dan mendapat 1 HKG menjadi gaji terbaru ialah RM2962.15. Gaji pokok kami DGA29/41 hanya RM2509.90 bagi yang sama tempoh berkhidmat iaitu 15 tahun yang asalnya kami dari DGA29/DG6.
Tahun 2011, baru cukup 10 tahun saya berkhidmat iaitu 7 tahun DG41 sekarang ditambah 3 tahun dulu (9tahun DGA29) baru layak memohon DG44 tapi tiada jaminan untuk saya akan mendapat segera jawatan Gred DG44 sedangkan dan memandangkan masih lagi terdapat berpuluh ibu orang guru DG41 yang sudah cukup dan melebihi tempoh 10 tahun berkhidmat yang sudah lama reput menunggu pun, masih belum mendapat lagi lantikan DG44.
Tahun 2011, gaji pokok saya DGA29/41baru mencecah RM2690.80 tetapi DGA32/41 sudah mencecah RM3143.05. Perbezaannya ialah RM452.25. Tahun berikutnya kadar kenaikan gaji tahunan guru DGA32/41 ialah RM150 sebab sudah melebihi RM3143.05 tetapi saya masih lagi dengan RM90 kerana belum mencapai RM3143.05. Kami memerlukan 5 tahun lagi untuk mencapai RM3143.05. Sedangkan dalam masa 5 tahun itu gaji pokok DG32/41 sudah RM3894.45. Perbezaan di sini pula ialah RM751.40.
Seandainya kami murah rezeki dan mendapat segera jawatan DG44 pada tahun 2012, gaji pokok kami yang baru ialah P1T1/DG44 ialah RM2982.99 tetapi guru DG32/41 sudah RM3293.33. Perbezaannya ialah RM3293.33 – RM2982.99 = RM310.34.
Kesimpulannya sampai mati pun kami tak dapat menyamai malah terus ketinggalan gaji yang ketara di belakang guru DG32/41. Pada hal kami sama-sama posting dan sama lama tempoh berkhidmat.
Untuk makluman tuan, insentif tempoh perkhidmatan DGA29 dulu diambil kira juga untuk time based buat guru DGA32/41 dan bukan untuk kami sahaja. Ini bermaksud tidak ada apa-apa yang istimewa tentang kami DGA29/41walaupun gaji pokok kami ketinggalan di belakang gaji pokok mereka.
Untuk makluman tuan juga, guru DGA32 yang akan dilantik ke DG41sekarang, Guru Cemerlang yang dipendekkan time based dari 7 kepada 5 tahun untuk kenaikan pangkat/gred ke peringkat ke seterusnya dan Guru Besar DG41 di sekolah rendah yang perlu 3 tahun dan bukannya 10 tahun lagi macam kami DGA29/41 untuk bakal mendapat DG44 langsung tidak mempedulikan isu ini tetapi tiba-tiba sahaja mendapat ‘HADIAH’ lagi tapi saya dan guru-guru DGA29/41 yang memerah otak dan berhempas pulas memperjuangkan nasib kami, rupa-rupanya kami hanya dapat penat sahaja malah dapat memberi keuntungan kepada guru lain yang sudah mencurah-curah rezeki.
Jika pihak NUTP ragu atau tidak percaya pada data di atas, kena rajin-rajinkanlah diri menyemak dan mengkaji JADUAL GAJI BARU UNTUK SEMUA GRED GURU yang NUTP bekalkan kepada saya.

akuan bersumpah

Surat Sumpah Balasubramaniam

SEORANG penjenguk blog ini telah mengirimkan surat akuan bersumpah yang dibuat oleh Balasubramainiam a/l Perumal. Surat dalam bahasa Inggeris disiarkan sepenuhnya. Terima kasih kepada penjenguk yang bermurah hati mengirimkan surat ini.


STATUTORY DECLARATION

I, Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal (NRIC NO: 600928-08-6235) a Malaysian Citizen of full age and residing at No. 32, Jalan Pelangi 1, Taman Pelangi, Rawang, Selangor do solemly and sincerely declare as follows :-

1. I have been a police officer with the Royal Malaysian Police Force having jointed as a constable in 1981 attached to the Police Field Force. I was then promoted to the rank of lance Corporal and finally resigned from the Police Force in 1998 when I was with the Special Branch.

2. I have been working as a free lance Private Investigator since I left the Police Force.

3. Sometime in June or July 2006, I was employed by Abdul Razak Baginda for a period of 10 days to look after him at his office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang between the hours of 8.00 a.m. to 5.00 p.m each working day as apparently he was experiencing disturbances from a third party.

4. I resigned from this job after 2 ½ days as I was not receiving any proper instructions.

5. I was however re-employed by Abdul Razak Baginda on the 05-10-2006 as he had apparently received a harassing phone call from a Chinese man calling himself ASP Tan who had threatened him to pay his debts. I later found out this gentleman was in fact a private investigator called Ang who was employed by a Mongolian woman called Altantuya Shaaribuu.

6. Abdul Razak Baginda was concerned that a person by the name of Altantuya Shaaribuu, a Mongolian woman, was behind this threat and that she would be arriving in Malaysia very soon to try and contact him.

7. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that he was concerned by this as he had been advised that Altantuya Shaaribuu had been given some powers by a Mongolian ‘bomoh’ and that he could never look her in the face because of this.

8. When I enquired as to who this Mongolian woman was, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that she was a friend of his who had been introduced to him by a VIP and who asked him to look after her financially.

9. I advised him to lodge a police report concerning the threatening phone call he had received from the Chinese man known as ASP Tan but he refused to do so as he informed me there were some high profile people involved.

10. Abdul Razak Baginda further told me that Altantuya Shaaribuu was a great liar and good in convincing people. She was supposed to have been very demanding financially and that he had even financed a property for her in Mongolia.

11. Abdul Razak Baginda then let me listen to some voice messages on his handphone asking him to pay what was due otherwise he would be harmed and his daughter harassed.
12. I was therefore supposed to protect his daughter Rowena as well.

13. On the 09.10.2006 I received a phone call from Abdul Razak Baginda at about 9.30 a.m. informing me that Altantuya was in his office and he wanted me there immediately. As I was in the midst of a surveillance, I sent my assistant Suras to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office and I followed a little later. Suras managed to control the situation and had persuaded Altantuya and her two friends to leave the premises. However Altantuya left a note written on some Hotel Malaya note paper, in English, asking Abdul Razak Baginda to call her on her handphone (number given) and wrote down her room number as well.

14. Altantuya had introduced herself to Suras as ‘Aminah’ and had informed Suras she was there to see her boyfriend Abdul Razak Baginda.

15. These 3 Mongolian girls however returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office at the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang again, the next day at about 12.00 noon. They did not enter the building but again informed Suras that they wanted to meet Aminah’s boyfriend, Abdul Razak Baginda.

16. On the 11.10.2006, Aminah returned to Abdul Razak Baginda’s office on her own and gave me a note to pass to him, which I did. Abdul Razak Baginda showed me the note which basically asked him to call her urgently.

17. I suggested to Abdul Razak Baginda that perhaps it may be wise to arrange for Aminah to be arrested if she harassed him further, but he declined as he felt she would have to return to Mongolia as soon as her cash ran out.

18. In the meantime I had arranged for Suras to perform surveillance on Hotel Malaya to monitor the movements of these 3 Mongolian girls, but they recognized him. Apparently they become friends with Suras after that and he ended up spending a few nights in their hotel room.

19. When Abdul Razak Baginda discovered Suras was becoming close to Aminah he asked me to pull him out from Hotel Malaya.

20. On the 14.10.2006, Aminah turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights when I was not there. Abdul Razak Baginda called me on my handphone to inform me of this so I rushed back to his house. As I arrived, I noticed Aminah outside the front gates shouting “Razak, bastard, come out from the house”. I tried to calm her down but couldn’t so I called the police who arrived in 2 patrol cars. I explained the situation to the police, who took her away to the Brickfields police station.

21. I followed the patrol cars to Brickfields police station in a taxi. I called Abdul Razak Baginda and his lawyer Dirren to lodge a police report but they refused.
22. When I was at the Brickfields police station, Aminah’s own Private Investigator, one Mr. Ang arrived and we had a discussion. I was told to deliver a demand to Abdul Razak Baginda for USD$500,000.00 and 3 tickets to Mongolia, apparently as commission owed to Aminah from a deal in Paris.

23. As Aminah had calmed down at this stage, a policewoman at the Brickfields police station advised me to leave and settle the matter amicably.

24. I duly informed Abdul Razak Baginda of the demands Aminah had made and told him I was disappointed that no one wanted to back me up in lodging a police report. We had a long discussion about the situation when I expressed a desire to pull out of this assignment.

25. During this discussion and in an attempt to persuade me to continue my employment with him, Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that :-

25.1 He had been introduced to Aminah by Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a diamond exhibition in Singapore.

25.2 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak informed Abdul Razak Baginda that he had a sexual relationship with Aminah and that she was susceptible to anal intercourse.

25.3 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak wanted Abdul Razak Baginda to look after Aminah as he did not want her to harass him since he was now the Deputy Prime Minister.

25.4 Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak, Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had all been together at a dinner in Paris.

25.5 Aminah wanted money from him as she felt she was entitled to a USD$500,000.00 commission on a submarine deal she assisted with in Paris.

26. On the 19.10.2006, I arrived at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house in Damansara Heights to begin my night duty. I had parked my car outside as usual. I saw a yellow proton perdana taxi pass by with 3 ladies inside, one of whom was Aminah. The taxi did a U-turn and stopped in front of the house where these ladies rolled down the window and wished me ‘Happy Deepavali’. The taxi then left.

27. About 20 minutes later the taxi returned with only Aminah in it. She got out of the taxi and walked towards me and started talking to me. I sent an SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda informing him “Aminah was here”. I received an SMS from Razak instructing me “To delay her until my man comes”.

28. Whist I was talking to Aminah, she informed me of the following :-

28.1 That she met Abdul Razak Baginda in Singapore with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

28.2 That she had also met Abdul Razak Baginda and Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak at a dinner in Paris.

28.3 That she was promised a sum of USD$500,000.00 as commission for assisting in a Submarine deal in Paris.

28.4 That Abdul Razak Baginda had bought her a house in Mongolia but her brother had refinanced it and she needed money to redeem it.

28.5 That her mother was ill and she needed money to pay for her treatment.

28.6 That Abdul Razak Baginda had married her in Korea as her mother is Korean whilst her father was a Mongolian/Chinese mix.

28.7 That if I wouldn’t allow her to see Abdul Razak Baginda, would I be able to arrange for her to see Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak.

29. After talking to Aminah for about 15 minutes, a red proton aeroback arrived with a woman and two men. I now know the woman to be Lance Corporal Rohaniza and the men, Azilah Hadri and Sirul Azahar. They were all in plain clothes. Azilah walked towards me while the other two stayed in the car.

30. Azilah asked me whether the woman was Aminah and I said ‘Yes’. He then walked off and made a few calls on his handphone. After 10 minutes another vehicle, a blue proton saga, driven by a Malay man, passed by slowly. The drivers window had been wound down and the driver was looking at us.
31. Azilah then informed me they would be taking Aminah away. I informed Aminah they were arresting her. The other two persons then got out of the red proton and exchanged seats so that Lance Corporal Rohaniza and Aminah were in the back while the two men were in the front. They drove off and that is the last I ever saw of Aminah.

32. Abdul Razak Baginda was not at home when all this occurred.

33. After the 19.10.2006, I continued to work for Abdul Razak Baginda at his house in Damansara Heights from 7.00 p.m. to 8.00 a.m. the next morning, as he had been receiving threatening text messages from a woman called ‘Amy’ who was apparently ‘Aminah’s’ cousin in Mongolia.
34. On the night of the 20.10.2006, both of Aminah’s girl friends turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house enquiring where Aminah was. I informed them she had been arrested the night before.

35. A couple of nights later, these two Mongolian girls, Mr. Ang and another Mongolian girl called ‘Amy’ turned up at Abdul Razak Baginda’s house looking for Aminah as they appeared to be convinced she was being held in the house.

36. A commotion began so I called the police who arrived shortly thereafter in a patrol car. Another patrol car arrived a short while later in which was the investigating officer from the Dang Wangi Police Station who was in charge of the missing persons report lodged by one of the Mongolians girls, I believe was Amy.

37. I called Abdul Razak Baginda who was at home to inform him of the events taking place at his front gate. He then called DSP Musa Safri and called me back informing me that Musa Safri would be calling handphone and I was to pass the phone to the Inspector from Dang Wangi Police Station.

38. I then received a call on my handphone from Musa Safri and duly handed the phone to the Dang Wangi Inspector. The conversation lasted 3 – 4 minutes after which he told the girls to disperse and to go to see him the next day.

39. On or about the 24.10.2006, Abdul Razak Baginda instructed me to accompany him to the Brickfields police station as he had been advised to lodge a police report about the harassment he was receiving from these Mongolian girls.

40. Before this, Amy had sent me an SMS informing me she was going to Thailand to lodge a report with the Mongolian consulate there regarding Aminah’s disappearance. Apparently she had sent the same SMS to Abdul Razak Baginda. This is why he told me he had been advised to lodge a police report.

41. Abdul Razak Baginda informed me that DPS Musa Safri had introduced him to one DSP Idris, the head of the Criminal division, Brickfields police station, and that Idris had referred him to ASP Tonny.

42. When Abdul Razak Baginda had lodged his police report at Brickfields police station, in front of ASP Tonny, he was asked to make a statement but he refused as he said he was leaving for overseas. He did however promise to prepare a statement and hand ASP Tonny a thumb drive. I know that this was not done as ASP Tonny told me.

43. However ASP Tonny asked me the next day to provide my statement instead and so I did.

44. I stopped working for Abdul Razak Baginda on the 26.10.2006 as this was the day he left for Hong Kong on his own.

45. In mid November 2006, I received a phone call from ASP Tonny from the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah asking me to see him regarding Aminah’s case. When I arrived there I was immediately arrested under S.506 of the Penal Code for Criminal intimidation.

46. I was then placed in the lock up and remanded for 5 days. On the third day I was released on police bail.

47. At the end of November 2006, the D9 department of the IPK sent a detective to my house to escort me to the IPK Jalan Hang Tuah. When I arrived, I was told I was being arrested under S.302 of the Penal Code for murder. I was put in the lock up and remanded for 7 days.

48. I was transported to Bukit Aman where I was interrogated and questioned about an SMS I had received from Abdul Razak Baginda on the 19.10.2006 which read “delay her until my man arrives”. They had apparently retrieved this message from Abdul Razak Baginda’s handphone.

49. They then proceeded to record my statement from 8.30 a.m. to 6.00 p.m. everyday for 7 consecutive days. I told them all I knew including everything Abdul Razak Baginda and Aminah had told me about their relationships with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak but when I came to sign my statement, these details had been left out.

50. I have given evidence in the trial of Azilah, Sirul and Abdul Razak Baginda at the Shah Alam High Court. The prosecutor did not ask me any questions in respect of Aminah’s relationship with Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak or of the phone call I received from DSP Musa Safri, whom I believe was the ADC for Datuk Seri Najib Razak and/or his wife.

51. On the day Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested, I was with him at his lawyers office at 6.30 a.m. Abdul Razak Baginda informed us that he had sent Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak an SMS the evening before as he refused to believe he was to be arrested, but had not received a response.

52. Shortly thereafter, at about 7.30 a.m., Abdul Razak Baginda received an SMS from Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak and showed, this message to both myself and his lawyer. This message read as follows :- “ I am seeing IGP at 11.00 a.m. today …… matter will be solved … be cool”.

53. I have been made to understand that Abdul Razak Baginda was arrested the same morning at his office in the Bangunan Getah Asli, Jalan Ampang.

54. The purpose of this Statutory declaration is to :-

54.1 State my disappointment at the standard of investigations conducted by the authorities into the circumstances surrounding the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.2 Bring to the notice of the relevant authorities the strong possibility that there are individuals other than the 3 accused who must have played a role in the murder of Altantuya Shaaribuu.

54.3 Persuade the relevant authorities to reopen their investigations into this case immediately so that any fresh evidence may be presented to the Court prior to submissions at the end of the prosecutions case.

54.4 Emphasize the fact that having been a member of the Royal Malaysian Police Force for 17 years I am absolutely certain no police officer would shoot someone in the head and blow up their body without receiving specific instructions from their superiors first.
54.5. Express my concern that should the defence not be called in the said murder trial, the accused, Azilah and Sirul will not have to swear on oath and testify as to the instructions they received and from whom they were given.

55. And I make this solemn declaration conscientiously believing the same be true and by virtue of the provisions of the Statutory Declaration Act 1960.

SUBCRIBED and solemnly )
declared by the abovenamed )
Balasubramaniam a/l Perumal

Tuesday, 11 December 2012

DINAR IRAQ---BETUL KE

  1. Ada 3 minggu lagi untuk kita cash in. Ini maklumat terbaru yang saya perolehi. Bahkan ada sumber dari negara Arab, kata 17 haribulan ini. Juga banyak sumber-sumber yang saya amat percayai, seawal bulan ini ataupun selewat-lewatnya sebelum Mac 2013. Genap 10 tahun selepas kejatuhan nilai IQD yang kita beli hari ini. InsyaALLAH tunggu masa sahaja buat kita semua. Semua dah boleh tersenyum dan fikirkan perancangan masa depan buat kita semua.

    Saya amat yakin bahawa IQD akan naik...

    bila-bila masa dari sekarang. Kalau kita menjengah forum US pun. Kita lihat mereka dalam mood stand by sekarang. Semua bercakap soal masa depan. Kita tunggu dan bagi umat islam, teruskan berdoa dan bertawakal dengan illahi.

    Buat pelanggan saya, anda tidak perlu risau untuk cash in nanti kerana saya akan menukarnya nanti. Syarikat saya adalah berstatus Sdn. Bhd. dan berdaftar dengan Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia (SSM). Beroperasi di Solaris Dutamas, Jalan Duta, Kuala Lumpur (gambar di atas) dan sudah menandatangani MOA dengan syarikat pengurup wang luar negara dan juga bank pesisir pantai. Kami boleh uruskan duit anda semua bila cash in nanti. Tax kerajaan akan di satukan dan kita cash in mengikut undang-undang negara dan antarabangsa. No siri semuanya ada simpanan rekod kami dan anda hanya menunggu ringgit Malaysia sahaja di tangan anda atau di dalam akaun peribadi anda sahaja.

    Ini janji syarikat kami. Saya ada juga menerima panggilan mereka-mereka yang bukan pelanggan saya untuk 'menumpang' bila cash in nanti (terutamanya pelanggan mydinar.biz dan koleksi dinar iraq (yang sudah ditutup khabarnya). Apa yang saya boleh katakan ialah saya perlu bersikap adil dengan pelanggan saya. Saya akan buat hanya untuk pelanggan saya sahaja. Yang lain, mungkin wang anda disekat atau anda akan disabitkan dengan jenayah money laundering, atau penggubahan wang haram. Ini benar-benar dan ianya boleh disabitkan kerana mungkin wang IQD yang anda simpan sekarang ini adalah melalui jalan 'belakang' dan dbeli melalui pihak 'third party', yang tiada autoriti dan tiada pengesahan daripada pihak yang bawa masuk.

    Saya sebenarnya bukan mereka-reka cerita ini. Tapi ianya adalah realiti undang-undang di negara kita. Apapun semuanya perlu bersedia sekarang, IQD bila-bila masa sahaja akan diapungkan. Iraq sekarang ini sedang menuju ke arah negara maju. Mereka sebenarnya sudah bersedia ke arah tersebut. 7 juta tong minyak dikeluarkan satu hari, petanda jelas bahawa RV sememangnya sudah dekat. RV sahaja IQD, sujud syukur kita semuanya, insyaALLAH

Friday, 7 December 2012

ANTARA 2 DARJAT

PELIK TAPI BENAR

Pada 16 Mei yang lalu, PM telah mengumumkan Hadiah Hari Guru kepada semua guru terutama guru-guru yang melanjutkan pelajaran ke peringkat ijazah pertama. Kini golongan ini dikenali DG2941. Namun hadiah itu tidak menyelesaikan masalah guru-guru DG2941 yang kini gajinya jauh lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan rakan setugas DG29 yang dilantik ke DG32 tanpa perlu mendapatkan ijazah pertama. Lihatlah perbandingan di bawah:
Guru A (DG 29 KE 32)
Lantikan pertama : 01.01.1995
Time-based DG32 : 01.01.2005 (RM2416.06)
2006 (RM2514.37)
2007 (RM2612.68)
2008 (RM2710.99)
2009 (RM2803.30)
2010 (RM2907.61)
2011 (RM3005.92)
Guru B (DG 29 KE 41)
Lantikan pertama : 01.01.1995
Lantikan DG41 : 2004 (RM1710.60)
9 tahun DG29 = 3 tahun DG41
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 = Sudah 5 tahun berada di DG41
3 + 5 = 8 tahun.
Lagi 2 tahun untuk layak ke DG44 secara Time-based.
2009 (RM2509.90)
2010 (RM2600.35)
2011 – Layak DG44 secara Time-based P1T1 (RM2982.99)
Walaupun naik ke DG44, lihatlah sendiri perbezaan gaji guru A dan guru B pada tahun 2011.

Ini tidak mengambil kira bahawa guru A sebenarnya sedang menunggu untuk dilantik ke DG41.
ADUHAI....APALAH NASIBMU WAHAI GURU-GURU DG2941....
WANG PULUHAN RIBU TELAH DIHABISKAN UNTUK MENGGENGGAM SEGULUNG IJAZAH....
MASA PULUHAN RIBU JAM JUGA TELAH DIHABISKAN UNTUK MENELAAH PELAJARAN....
KINI....KAU JUGA KETINGGALAN DIBELAKANG KAWANMU YANG SAMA-SAMA MENJEJAK KAKI MENJADI GURU TETAPI TIDAK MENJEJAK KAKI KE MENARA GADING......................

PELIK TAPI BENAR

Pada 16 Mei yang lalu, PM telah mengumumkan Hadiah Hari Guru kepada semua guru terutama guru-guru yang melanjutkan pelajaran ke peringkat ijazah pertama. Kini golongan ini dikenali DG2941. Namun hadiah itu tidak menyelesaikan masalah guru-guru DG2941 yang kini gajinya jauh lebih rendah dibandingkan dengan rakan setugas DG29 yang dilantik ke DG32 tanpa perlu mendapatkan ijazah pertama. Lihatlah perbandingan di bawah:
Guru A (DG 29 KE 32)
Lantikan pertama : 01.01.1995
Time-based DG32 : 01.01.2005 (RM2416.06)
2006 (RM2514.37)
2007 (RM2612.68)
2008 (RM2710.99)
2009 (RM2803.30)
2010 (RM2907.61)
2011 (RM3005.92)
Guru B (DG 29 KE 41)
Lantikan pertama : 01.01.1995
Lantikan DG41 : 2004 (RM1710.60)
9 tahun DG29 = 3 tahun DG41
2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008 = Sudah 5 tahun berada di DG41
3 + 5 = 8 tahun.
Lagi 2 tahun untuk layak ke DG44 secara Time-based.
2009 (RM2509.90)
2010 (RM2600.35)
2011 – Layak DG44 secara Time-based P1T1 (RM2982.99)
Walaupun naik ke DG44, lihatlah sendiri perbezaan gaji guru A dan guru B pada tahun 2011.

Ini tidak mengambil kira bahawa guru A sebenarnya sedang menunggu untuk dilantik ke DG41.
ADUHAI....APALAH NASIBMU WAHAI GURU-GURU DG2941....
WANG PULUHAN RIBU TELAH DIHABISKAN UNTUK MENGGENGGAM SEGULUNG IJAZAH....
MASA PULUHAN RIBU JAM JUGA TELAH DIHABISKAN UNTUK MENELAAH PELAJARAN....
KINI....KAU JUGA KETINGGALAN DIBELAKANG KAWANMU YANG SAMA-SAMA MENJEJAK KAKI MENJADI GURU TETAPI TIDAK MENJEJAK KAKI KE MENARA GADING......................
                                                                                            kredit tok moh
 

Saturday, 1 December 2012

TIDAK AKAN BERPUTUS ASA SESEORANG ITU MELAINKAN ORANG KAFIR

Berulang Ulang Melakukan DOSA & TAUBAT...


Diriwayatkan oleh Thabrani:
“Telah datang seorang laki-laki menghadap Rasulullah SAW lalu bertanya:
“Ya Rasulullah, salah seorang dari kami berdosa.
Bersabda Rasulullah: dituliskan dosanya.
Berkata orang itu: Lalu orang yang berdosa itu minta ampun atas dosa itu dan taubat.
Bersabda Rasulullah: Allah ampuni dosanya dan di beri taubat.
Berkata orang itu: Lalu orang itu kembali berbuat dosa
Bersabda Rasulullah: Dituliskan dosanya
Berkata orang itu: Lalu orang berdosa itu kembali minta ampun dan taubat atas dosanya itu.
Bersabda Rasulullah: Allah ampuni dan beri taubat baginya, dan tidaklah Allah bosan memberi ampunan dan taubat selama orang itu tidak bosan minta ampun dan taubat

KREDIT QUE HAIDAR

PERINGATAN BUAT DIRI


Sekadar renungan bersama, semoga ianya menjadi peringatan bagi kita yang sering lalai dan lupa.

Gambaran manusia yang berdosa di Padang Mahsyar:

1. Suka menabur fitnah sesama manusia
Berwajah Kera

2. Suka memberi & menerima rasuah
Berwajah Khinzir

3. Hakim yang zalim ketika menjatuhi hukuman
Buta Kedua Belah Mata

4. Suka menunjuk-nunjuk amal ibadat & kebajikan yang dilakukan kepada orang lain .
Pekak Dan Bisu

5. Golongan yang berilmu & mengajar orang lain tetapi perbuatannya sendiri tidak sama dengan apa yang dikatakannya .
Tubuh Yang Mengalir Nanah & Darah Yang Amat Busuk Serta Menikam Lidahnya Berkali-Kali

6. Menjadi saksi tetapi berbohong terhadap kebenaran
Badannya Luka Seperti Dihiris

7. Orang yang kedekut membelanjakan sedikit hartanya untuk kebajikan
Berjalan Terhuyung Hayang Seperti Cacat

8. Orang yang suka bercerita hal-hal dunia didalam masjid
Berjalan Seperti Mabuk

9. Orang-orang pemakan riba
Rupa Badannya Seperti Khinzir

10. Suka menyakiti @ menyusahkan jiran sekeliling

Tidak Bertangan dan Tidak Berkaki

11. Suka mempermudahkan solat & lalai dalam solatnya hingga sering terlupa rukun
Wajah dan Badan Seakan Khinzir

12. Tidak mahu mengeluarkan zakat terhadap dirinya, pendapatannya, terhadap perniagaan & lain-lain zakat
Perut Dipenuhi Ular dan Kalajengking Yang Sering Menyengatnya

13. Melakukan maksiat secara sembunyi-sembunyi
Badannya Sangat Busuk Seperti Bau Bangkai

14. Malas dan jarang mengucap dua kalimah syahadah
Tidak Berlidah Dan Darah Yang Amat Busuk Mengalir Dari Mulut

15. Suka melakukan zina
Berjalan Kaki Keatas Dan Kepala Kebawah, Darah Dan Nanah Sentiasa Mengalir Dari Kemaluan

16. Suka makan harta anak yatim
Muka Hitam Dan Perutnya Dipenuhi Api

17. Orang yang menderhaka kepada kedua orang tuanya
Kulit Dipenuhi Penyakit Sopak Dan Kudis

18. Orang yang suka minum arak @ segala jenis benda yang menghayalkan seperti dadah dan lain-lain
Giginya Seperti Tanduk Lembu, Lidah Terjelir Hingga Keperut, Najis & Air Kencingnya Sentiasa Menagalir Keluar Dari Kemaluan

Wallahu a’lam


KREDIT Kongsi